From the start of this reading assignment, I made it my
mission to read The Year of Living
Biblically, as the premise of the book intrigued me. As a Roman Catholic, I knew that I was supposed to
follow the Bible as strictly as possible, which I have always found to be
nearly impossible in these modern times. How could I not covet my friend's
shiny new iPhone, or say that tiny white lie to my parents about not having a
lot of homework? I figured this book would ease my guilt and help me to realize
that most of these biblical rules are outdated, and that hardly anyone adheres
to them anymore (such as not wearing mixed fibers or sewing tassels to the end
of clothes).
The
book begins with the Jewish-born but agnostic author, A.J. Jacobs, deciding to
go throughout several versions of the Jewish Torah and Christian Bible and
writing down every single rule that
he comes across. It will be his mission to follow the Bible as accurately as
possible. While it proves to be a challenge, he is determined to adhere
strictly to it in order to get down to the roots of his abandoned religion. He
stones adulterers (with pebbles, of course), grows out his beard, stops lying,
doesn't touch women for fear that they may be "impure," doesn't wear
clothes made of mixed fibers, and so on. He even goes to visit several
religious groups that attempt to follow the Bible to the letter, to find out
how they cope with modern times (such as the Amish and Jehovah's Witnesses).
Overall,
I really enjoy this book so far. The author writes with a humorous tone, and
his journey throughout the Bible pulls me in. It also made me think: Why do
some people choose the Bible to justify their causes (gay marriage, anti-
abortion, etc.), but don't follow even half the rules laid out for them? What
gives them the right to tell people whether or not they are sinning, while they
actively break multiple rules? What gives people the right to pick and choose?
Hey Taylor, do you mind explaining to me a bit more on what you mean with:
ReplyDelete"Why do some people choose the Bible to justify their causes (gay marriage, anti- abortion, etc.), but don't follow even half the rules laid out for them? What gives them the right to tell people whether or not they are sinning, while they actively break multiple rules? What gives people the right to pick and choose?"
Not that it's bad, I am just curious and want to see deeper into what exactly you mean.